Then Tinder connects you on the app, allowing you to chat. Yes, it’s a shallow dating app based on physical appearances; however, it’s not much different than meeting someone at a bar (minus the fact that you can see how tall someone is in person and the chances you’re inebriated are slightly reduced).
When I first heard mention of the app it was referred to as the ‘straight’ version of Grindr.However, there seems to be little public guidance especially to young teenagers who may be experimenting, on what the law states is the correct age for 'cybersex' (Sexual talk online, via chartrooms, webcameras, text messages.) One would usually employ logic and reason to deduce that if it is ok in the eyes of the law for a 100 year old outside a position of trust to have consensual sex with a 16 year old, that the state would even marry the two and allow them to co-habitat in a rented council house and be taxed, that you would expect cyber sex to be set at 16 regardless of the age of the other, as long as he/she is 16 also; considering that scots law can go against the known rules of logic and reason, I feel the police are best to clarify what the law states for others.My question is therefore thus: A) Is it a criminal offence for an adult 18 outside a position of trust to engage in coessential adult cybersex with a 16 year old ?It was like having leprosy.'Now 51, Jessica is single again, having spent 15 years dating with herpes.'What other personal thing would you tell people so early on in a relationship?