Porn text chat safety issues of carbon dating

Their judgment was published in full, earlier this week, by blogger Obscenity Lawyer, a solicitor and one of the UK's leading legal experts providing advice to defendants on matters of obscenity and extreme porn.The judgment states (par 21): There could be no sensible reason for the legislature having excluded otherwise obscene material from the scope of the legislation, merely because it was likely to be read by, and therefore liable to deprave and corrupt, only one person...In February, we reported that many Discord users were facing abuse and were given no clear recourse.

On Discord, users can only direct message each other if they're friends or if they both share a chat server in common.

Initially, the legal reaction was that such a case could not possibly succeed - and that was pretty much the view of the judge who threw it out when first it arrived at Maidstone Crown Court in November 2011.

But that was before an appeal brought by the prosecution in February of this year, and the appeal court ruling in which three appeal judges - Lord Justice Richards, Mr Justice Kenneth Parker and Mr Justice Lindblom - ruled unequivocally that publication to an individual did fall within the meaning of the OPA.

Chief Executive of the Heimdal security firm, Morten Kjaersgaard told the BBC: "It can do a lot of damage - maybe running up a big phone bill for which the customer would be liable."It's not like when you use your credit card and there's an international standard for banks covering [fraud]."Heimdal tested the Mazar malware on smartphone running Android 4.4 Kit Kat and lower.

Later versions of Google's hugely-popular mobile operating system have not been tested.